April 27, 2015

Unhappy ‘Birthday Party’ for Education Reform

Print More

CAPITOL WATCH State Capitol Photo 1

M. Scott Carter

M. Scott Carter

M. Scott Carter reports on politics, legislation and other issues from the State Capitol.

 

 

House Democrats held a birthday party and a press conference on Monday. There were lots of people and even a cake.

But it was a pretty somber affair.

House Minority Leader Rep. Scott Inman, D-Del City.

House Minority Leader Rep. Scott Inman, D-Del City.

House Democratic Leader Rep. Scott Inman said he wanted to remind people about the 25th anniversary of House Bill 1017, a huge education reform and tax package passed by the Legislature and signed into law in 1990 by then-Gov. Henry Bellmon, a Republican.

The bill’s reforms included smaller class sizes, higher teacher pay, statewide curriculum standards, school district consolidation and, Democrats said, “millions of additional dollars pumped into this state’s public school system.”

The measure was controversial. Because of its funding and the tax increase on businesses, shortly after the bill became law, a business group, upset by the tax increase, attempted to repeal the law.

The repeal effort went to a public vote. HB 1017 survived, but not long afterward Oklahoma City stockbroker Dan Brown helped form a group called Stop New Taxes and successfully launched an initiative petition to limit the Legislature’s ability to raise new taxes. That initiative petition became State Question 640, which requires all tax increases be approved by either a three-fourths vote of the House and Senate or a majority vote in the next general election.

Since then, Democrats say, many of the gains enabled by HB 1017 have been lost.

“A quarter of a century later, though, Oklahoma’s public school system is still ranked near the bottom nationally because the quality measurers in HB 1017 were never fully actualized,” said Rep. Donnie Condit, D-McAlester.

Inman, however, called for “a renewal of the principals that made HB 1017 a groundbreaking measure.”

  • george davis

    We privately funded a public elementary school in enid , Adams elementary. It is “poverty” school. The students there are doing fine. Is it possible these legislators could point to Adams and say “this is what happens when you fund a “poverty grade school”. Adams now has, among other things, one for one computers for each student , 5 extra teachers, school nurse, other tech improvements. It has worked. If funding solves the problem, Adams proves it. Why not point to it and say, “this is how much we need to achieve the results”. This is not theory. This is a reality that works, here in Enid

  • Liz Randolph

    Go George!!!! Adams School, my Alma Mater!! Wow! I’m so moved by this!

  • Kyle Dahlem

    Implementation of HB1017 made a difference in attendance, student performance and graduation rates over the first 10 years of its passage (check the data). 1991 third graders hit the projected mark over those years. Too often, expectations are that results will happen within one year. The reality is that education is cumulative and must be analyzed over years.

    With that being said, HB 1017 was never meant to be the end-all reform. The changing economic, cultural, political world demands creativity, innovation to meet the needs of 3rd graders in today’s classrooms. Rather than diminishing, policymakers should be enhancing the educational opportunities of these children. Thinking of long-term needs and results does not seem to be the forte’ of those making decisions. “Just sayin'”