Despite Muskogee County Seizure, Forfeiture Laws Remain Untouched

Print More

Police Car Lights

On Sunday, the Washington Post published a story about Muskogee County sheriff’s deputies seizing more than $53,000 in cash raised to benefit a Christian college in Burma and an orphanage in Thailand.

A day later, the Muskogee County District Attorney’s Office abruptly dismissed the civil asset forfeiture case and an accompanying criminal charge, the Tulsa World reported.

The seizure of the money rekindled questions about the law enforcement practice of confiscating and keeping people’s cash or property without obtaining a conviction, and often without filing a charge.

Authorities insist such seizures are an essential tool in the war on drug traffickers and say abuses are rare.

The Post reported that the $53,000 in cash had been raised by a rock band from Burma that was touring the U.S. A volunteer manager for the band was driving through Oklahoma on Feb. 27 when deputies pulled his car over for a broken taillight.

Deputies used a drug-sniffing dog around the vehicle. The dog “alerted,” and deputies seized the $53,000 in what the story says were ticket and CD sales and other expense funds for the band.

The stop and seizure follows a number of factors typical of police seizures of cash, as reported in Oklahoma Watch’s series on the state’s civil asset forfeiture system. Among the factors, the investigation showed, are that such stops involve predominantly non-white drivers, that many targets of such seizures claim innocence, and that police often employ certain tactics in stopping motorists and conducting searches. Oklahoma Watch also cataloged misspending of forfeiture funds by law enforcement and reported on a pushback by law enforcement officials and others who defend civil asset forfeiture.

Sen. Kyle Loveless, R-Oklahoma City, introduced legislation this year that would have required a criminal conviction in order for cash or property to be forfeited. It also proposed requiring forfeited money to go to the state’s general fund instead of the agency making the seizure.

Attempts to get the bills heard in an official capacity were blocked by Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Anthony Sykes, R-Moore.

Loveless said it is unlikely most changes to the law will be passed this year. He said  the Post story shows that reforms are needed.

“I think it’s ironic that two days after my bill died in committee (Feb. 25), this guy’s property rights died on the side of the road,” Loveless said. “I would like to say I’m surprised, but I’m not. We’ve shown for over a year that innocent people’s stuff get’s taken quite often.”

  • REALConservative

    And this is just another example why the days when it was respectable to be a cop in America are long past.

  • Middling

    What is it with Cops in Oklahoma? First the cops shoot folks already under control, i.e cold blooded murder, now they are robbing Christian Charities. What’s next mugging kindergarters of their lunch money?

    And, some folks wonder why cops are held in such contempt.

  • Kelly

    I think law enforcement sees civil asset forfeiture as an easy way to raise funds for their agency. They probably get 2 months off from having to meet their ticket quotas if it is a large amounts of assets in the way of property or cash that they are able to steal from the peasantry.

    Actually I support our law enforcement personal, however I do believe there are quite a few bad apples in the bunch and this law is ripe for abuse.