[This article was originally delivered to subscribers of our Education Watch newsletter. Sign up now to receive Education Watch directly in your inbox.]

Note: Today’s Education Watch newsletter was written by Oklahoma Watch’s summer reporting intern Yasmeen Saadi.

The assistant district attorney in Noble County dismissed charges against four school board members in Billings accused of violating the Open Meeting Act. The members were arrested in November and accused of meeting multiple times outside of public meetings, including in June 2022 to hire a new superintendent, according to a court affidavit.

Assistant District Attorney Christopher Landes said he dropped the case because he determined the members did not “willfully violate” the act. “Willful violation” is a term used in the statute. He said it looked like the members attempted to follow a provision in the law that allows for the continuation of a regularly scheduled meeting.

“It was probably not the best way (for the board members) to handle it, but I believe there was an attempt to handle it in what they felt was the right way,” Landes said.

All elected and appointed school board members are required to attend training, including on open meeting laws. Landes said the members agreed to do an additional training session on the Open Meeting Act. The attorney for the defendants, Clint Claypole, declined to comment.

The Open Meeting Act exists to encourage an informed citizenry and to ensure the public understands the problems and processes of the government. Under the act, a majority of a public body, or quorum, can’t discuss public business outside of a public meeting. Violating the Open Meeting Act is a misdemeanor punishable by up to one year in jail and a fine of $500. It’s rarely enforced with criminal charges. 

Willful violation is not defined in state law. However, Oklahoma courts have said a public official does not need to show bad faith or harmful intent to be prosecuted; blatant or deliberate disregard of the law is enough. A willful violation includes public meeting notices that are vague or misleading.

Transparency experts said the Open Meeting Act is not strictly enforced and there aren’t strict provisions in how the law is written.

Oklahoma State University professor Joey Senat researches freedom of information laws. Senat said it falls on district attorneys to enforce the law.

“The public relies on the district attorneys to enforce this statute as a criminal statute,” Senat said. “And I consider violations of the statute to be a form of public corruption. I mean, the statute exists for a reason, it’s an important reason. It exists so the public can see the decision making process of its elected officials.”

— Yasmeen Saadi

Recommended Reading

  • Officials at Tulsa Public Schools say they have not had any direct contact with Superintendent Ryan Walters about plans to address his financial and academic concerns with the district. [Tulsa World]
  • In 24 states, including Oklahoma, parents risk criminal prosecution for using a false address to get their children into a better school. One state, Connecticut, has decriminalized address sharing. [The 74]
  • A state law banning some discussions on race has history teachers treading lightly on lessons about the Tulsa Race Massacre. [The Frontier]
  • State takeovers of public school districts are increasing, especially in Republican states. But there’s limited evidence it actually helps students. [The Hechinger Report]

Tweet Watch

New on Oklahoma Watch

Homeless Youth Walk a Hidden Path in Rural Oklahoma

Homeless youth have less access to shelters and services in rural Oklahoma. Because of challenges in identifying and tracking rural homeless youth, the population is often severely underreported.

[Read More]

Experts: Money Alone Can’t Solve Mental Health Access Issues in Rural Jails

Despite more funding, advocates for criminal justice reform warn that wide swaths of the state are at a disadvantage, unable to provide proper mental health and substance abuse treatment.

[Read More]

Legal Challenge Filed Against Publicly Funded Religious Charter School

Opponents of the Catholic virtual charter school say it’s unlawful because it will discriminate against students and teach religious curriculum in violation of state law and the state constitution.

[Read More]

Help Us Make a Difference

Oklahoma needs high-quality investigative journalism. That is our mission at Oklahoma Watch. We produce stories that hold government and public officials accountable and that make transparent what some prefer to keep secret. We depend on financial support from readers like you to sustain our coverage. Help us make a difference.

Support our publication

Every day we strive to produce journalism that matters — stories that strengthen accountability and transparency, provide value and resonate with readers like you.

This work is essential to a better-informed community and a healthy democracy. But it isn’t possible without your support.

Creative Commons License

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.